よむ、つかう、まなぶ。
医療機器研究報告 (113 ページ)
出典
| 公開元URL | https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi2/0000190382_00011.html |
| 出典情報 | 薬事・食品衛生審議会 医療機器・再生医療等製品安全対策部会（令和4年度第1回 7／12）《厚生労働省》 |
ページ画像
ダウンロードした画像を利用する際は「出典情報」を明記してください。
低解像度画像をダウンロード
プレーンテキスト
資料テキストはコンピュータによる自動処理で生成されており、完全に資料と一致しない場合があります。
テキストをコピーしてご利用いただく際は資料と付け合わせてご確認ください。
研究報告
番号
医療機器の一般名
文献名
【Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98:365–370. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29742】Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for
1009
ウシ心のう膜弁
degenerate aortic valves: Experience with a new supra-annular device. The Spanish Allegra valve-in-valve (SAVIV)
registry
【The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02234-y】Characteristic
1010
機械式人工心臓弁
localization patterns of thrombus on various brands of bileaflet mitral mechanical heart valves as assessed by threedimensional transesophageal echocardiography and their relationship with thromboembolism
1011
1012
1013
1014
人工股関節寛骨臼コン
【HIP International. 2021;21:4:465-471】Survival of monoblock RM vitamys compared with modular PINNACLE cups:
ポーネント
mid-term outcomes of 200 hips performed by a single surgeon.
弁形成リング
【Clinical Research in Cardiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01844-9】Minimally-invasive mitral valve repair
of symmetric and asymmetric Barlow’s disease
循環補助用心内留置型ポ 【ESC heart failure 2021; Vol.8. No5,3594-3602】Outcome of patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported
ンプカテーテル
by percutaneous left ventricular assist device
循環補助用心内留置型ポ 【Journal of cardiac surgery 2021; Vol.36. No11,4141-4152】Propensity score‐based analysis of 30‐day survival in
ンプカテーテル
cardiogenic shock patients supported with different microaxial left ventricular assist devices
【 Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (September–October 2021) 37(5):496–505
1015
ウシ心のう膜弁
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01166-5 】Mid-term clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes for the
Trifecta bioprosthesis
1016
ブタ心臓弁
1017
ブタ心臓弁
【Ann Thorac Surg 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.097】Durability of Mitral Valve Replacement With
a Third-generation Bioprosthesis
【JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL.14, NO.8, 2021】Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for
Failed Surgical Bioprostheses
113 / 224
番号
医療機器の一般名
文献名
【Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98:365–370. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.29742】Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for
1009
ウシ心のう膜弁
degenerate aortic valves: Experience with a new supra-annular device. The Spanish Allegra valve-in-valve (SAVIV)
registry
【The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02234-y】Characteristic
1010
機械式人工心臓弁
localization patterns of thrombus on various brands of bileaflet mitral mechanical heart valves as assessed by threedimensional transesophageal echocardiography and their relationship with thromboembolism
1011
1012
1013
1014
人工股関節寛骨臼コン
【HIP International. 2021;21:4:465-471】Survival of monoblock RM vitamys compared with modular PINNACLE cups:
ポーネント
mid-term outcomes of 200 hips performed by a single surgeon.
弁形成リング
【Clinical Research in Cardiology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-021-01844-9】Minimally-invasive mitral valve repair
of symmetric and asymmetric Barlow’s disease
循環補助用心内留置型ポ 【ESC heart failure 2021; Vol.8. No5,3594-3602】Outcome of patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported
ンプカテーテル
by percutaneous left ventricular assist device
循環補助用心内留置型ポ 【Journal of cardiac surgery 2021; Vol.36. No11,4141-4152】Propensity score‐based analysis of 30‐day survival in
ンプカテーテル
cardiogenic shock patients supported with different microaxial left ventricular assist devices
【 Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (September–October 2021) 37(5):496–505
1015
ウシ心のう膜弁
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01166-5 】Mid-term clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes for the
Trifecta bioprosthesis
1016
ブタ心臓弁
1017
ブタ心臓弁
【Ann Thorac Surg 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.097】Durability of Mitral Valve Replacement With
a Third-generation Bioprosthesis
【JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS VOL.14, NO.8, 2021】Prospective Evaluation of Transseptal TMVR for
Failed Surgical Bioprostheses
113 / 224